Posts Tagged ‘California Tea Party Voters Guide’

Dear Readers: I have been sitting with Horemheb this morning, going the the California ballot brochure for the November 6, 2012. I wanted to put-up the current list of propositions and associated voting suggestions, the SoCal Tax Revolt Coalition – San Diego Tea Party view of the items, and highlight a few recommendations from the San-Diego Local Order of Bloggers (SLOBs).

Qualified Statewide Ballot Measures for California General Election, Nov. 6, 2012


  • Proposition 30 – Temporary Taxes to Fund Education. Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

Increases personal income tax on annual earnings over $250,000 for seven years. Increases sales and use tax by ¼ cent for four years. Allocates temporary tax revenues 89 percent to K-12 schools and 11 percent to community colleges. Bars use of funds for administrative costs, but provides local school governing boards discretion to decide, in open meetings and subject to annual audit, how funds are to be spent. Guarantees funding for public safety services realigned from state to local governments.

(Hell No! There is no such thing as a temporary tax increase — and people should know to reject any item that is “for the children”. California’s citizens have been played for saps far too long. I am looking forward to the threats about providing basic public safety services, too!)

  • Proposition 31 –Establishes two-year state budget cycle.

Prohibits Legislature from creating expenditures of more than $25 million unless offsetting revenues or spending cuts are identified. Permits Governor to cut budget unilaterally during declared fiscal emergencies if Legislature fails to act.

(NO. From Left Coast Rebel – Constitution an incredibly anal process for local communities to adopt “Strategic Action Plans” serving such open-ended new age objectives as “community equity” and nudges them into establishing regional governments to push this agenda. The purpose of local governments is to provide basic services, not to pursue utopian four-year plans.)

  • Proposition 32 – Prohibits Political Contributions by Payroll Deduction.Prohibitions on Contributions to Candidates. Initiative Statute.

Restricts union political fundraising by prohibiting use of payroll-deducted funds for political purposes.

(YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! End the reign of union fiscal tyranny)!

  • Proposition 33 Changes current law to permit insurance companies to set prices based on whether the driver previously carried auto insurance with any insurance company.

Allows insurance companies to give proportional discounts to drivers with some prior insurance coverage.

(A very likely yes: The Goddess of Capitalism always approves of permitting businesses to decide whom to do business with and at what price-point).

  • Proposition 34 – Repeals death penalty as maximum punishment for persons found guilty of murder and replaces it with life imprisonment without possibility of parole.

Applies retroactively to persons already sentenced to death. Requires persons found guilty of murder to work while in prison, with their wages to be applied to any victim restitution fines or orders against them. Creates $100 million fund to be distributed to law enforcement agencies to help solve more homicide and rape cases. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Net savings to the state and counties that could amount to the high tens of millions of dollars annually on a statewide basis due to the elimination of the death penalty. One-time state costs totaling $100 million from 2012-13 through 2015-16 to provide funding to local law enforcement agencies.

(No. In my view, some crimes are so heinous as to warrant death as the best form of justice that humans can dish out. Also, where in the hell do the braniacs in Sacramento think that the $100 million dollar fund is going to come from? Have they discovered a fairy dust factory somewhere in this state? My object in legislation related to the death penalty would be how to expedite the process so the citizens of this good state don’t have to pay for their care and comfort longer than necessary)

  • Proposition 35 – Human Trafficking. Penalties. Sex Offender Registration. Initiative Statute.

Increases criminal penalties for human trafficking, including prison sentences up to 15-years-to-life and fines up to $1,500,000. Fines collected to be used for victim services and law enforcement. Requires person convicted of trafficking to register as sex offender. Requires sex offenders to provide information regarding Internet access and identities they use in online activities. Prohibits evidence that victim engaged in sexual conduct from being used against victim in court proceedings. Requires human trafficking training for police officers. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Potential one-time local government costs of up to a few million dollars on a statewide basis, and lesser additional costs incurred each year, due to the new mandatory training requirements for certain law enforcement officers. Minor increase to state and local governments on the costs of incarcerating and supervising human trafficking offenders. Unknown amount of additional revenue from new criminal fees, likely not to exceed the low millions of dollars annually, which would fund services for human trafficking victims.

(No. Yes, human traffickers are Satan’s minions and probably deserve the death penalty that a previous proposition is trying to end. My main problem is foisting millions of dollars on local communities to implement the program. The amount is probably an under-estimate, and local governments are going bankrupt all across California. We cannot afford it. I hope my fellow citizens use some fiscal logic, instead of their emotions, when making proposition choices)

  • Proposition 36 – Three Strikes Law. Sentencing for Repeat Felony Offenders.

Revises three strikes law to impose life sentence only when new felony conviction is serious or violent. Authorizes re-sentencing for offenders currently serving life sentences if third strike conviction was not serious or violent and judge determines sentence does not pose unreasonable risk to public safety. Continues to impose life sentence penalty if third strike conviction was for certain non-serious, non-violent sex or drug offenses or involved firearm possession. Maintains life sentence penalty for felons with non-serious, non-violent third strike if prior convictions were for rape, murder, or child molestation.

(A likely no: Why amend one of the few law enforcement programs that work?)

  • Proposition 37 – Genetically Engineered Foods. Mandatory Labeling.

Requires labeling on raw or processed food offered for sale to consumers if made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits labeling or advertising such food as “natural.”

(No: Agriculture has been nothing but a series of people genetically modifying plants and animals (look at the origins and development of fruit such as California’s naval oranges and Kobe beef.), Scaring people away from products that may be potentially more cost effective of have a health benefit (see golden rice) gets a big thumbs down from the Goddess of Capitalism) )

  • Proposition 38 – Tax for Education and Early Childhood Programs. Initiative Statute.

Increases personal income tax rates for annual earnings over $7,316 using sliding scale from .4% for lowest individual earners to 2.2% for individuals earning over $2.5 million, ending after twelve years. During first four years, 60% of revenues go to K-12 schools, 30% to repaying state debt, and 10% to early childhood programs. Thereafter, allocates 85% of revenues to K-12 schools, 15% to early childhood programs.

(Hell NO! Punishing wealth creators while creating more progressive indoctrination centers for young children is not a great idea).

  • Proposition 39 – Tax Treatment for Multistate Businesses. Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Funding. I

Requires multistate businesses to calculate their California income tax liability based on the percentage of their sales in California. Repeals existing law giving multistate businesses an option to choose a tax liability formula that provides favorable tax treatment for businesses with property and payroll outside California. Dedicates $550 million annually for five years from anticipated increase in revenue for the purpose of funding projects that create energy efficiency and clean energy jobs in California. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Approximately $500 million in additional state General Fund revenues in 2012-13 and $1 billion each year thereafter from requiring a single sales factor formula for corporate taxes, with about half of the additional annual revenues from 2013-14 through 2017-18 supporting energy efficiency and alternative energy projects. Increased Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee for K-14 schools of roughly $225 million annually from 2012-13 through 2017-18 and by roughly $500 million each year thereafter, as a result of additional state General Fund revenues.

(NO! Wow – can a proposition possibly be more full of fail ? More taxes, more bureaucracy, and green energy projects. See Solyndra, and pass this loser up.)

  • Proposition 40 – Redistricting. State Senate Districts.

State Senate districts are revised every ten years following the federal census. This year, the voter-approved California Citizens Redistricting Commission revised the boundaries of the 40 Senate districts. This referendum petition, if signed by the required number of registered voters and filed with the Secretary of State, will: (1) Place the revised State Senate boundaries on the ballot and prevent them from taking effect unless approved by the voters at the next statewide election; and (2) Require court-appointed officials to set interim boundaries for use in the next statewide election.

(A tepid yes. It is hard for me to believe any redistricting scheme won’t be used to protect the power of the political elite of both parties. But I so WANT to BELIEVE).


Other related links:

Prop 40: Your GOP Donations At Work – YES  
This is a monument to the stupidity of some Republican Party leaders, who spent nearly $2 million of party funds to qualify – and then drop – this referendum to overturn the Senate reapportionment because several state senators didn’t like their new districts.  They had hoped to run in their old seats, but after qualifying the initiative found out they couldn’t anyway.  A “Yes” vote affirms that the new non-partisan Citizens Redistricting Commission works.

Richard Rider chimes in with his picks on behalf of the San Diego Tax Fighters for San Diego County measures:

He also has a list of candidate recommendations:

  • Carl DeMaio Mayor of City of San Diego
  • Ray Ellis City Council of San Diego District 1
    Jerry Kern Mayor of Oceanside
  • George Plescia CA State Senate District 39
  • Scott Hasson San Diego Community College District B

And don’t forget to check out the CALIFORNIA JUDGE VOTER GUIDE FOR YOUR AREA! For the Shrine’s territory, here is the current view:


Read Full Post »


Dear Readers:  Several members of the San Diego Local Order of Bloggers (SLOBs) have noted that they are getting a lot of queries on the following search topic “Tea Party Voter Guide”.  So, we have all begun organizing our recommendations from varying perspectives; because there is no “leader”,  I will offer my Blue-Dog Democrat perspective along with those from my Libertarian/Republican/Conservative/Independent colleagues.

To get started, please review your ballot or a list of the current proposition slate for the June 5th election in California (click HERE for details).

Before I start on my list, I would like to direct you to a couple of others:

In fact, B-Daddy had an innovation I would like to adopt for the purposes of this post. In regards to the propositions, he notes: I am using my own shortened and more accurate versions of the titles. I will follow suit, using the ones he recommended.

So, onto the Blue-Dog, Catholic, Rebel Democrat list:

1) For President: Write In – Mickey Mouse (see THIS for a solid, reasoned perspective).

2) For Senator: Diane Feinstein. An important note to my Republican/Conservative friends — when the “Big Red Wave of 2010” stopped at the Sierras and the state GOP failed to eject the contemptible Babs Boxer, then how in the hell do you think they are going to get rid of the much more respected Feinstein? As a friend, I say this to you: Direct your money and energies to battleground Senate races (e.g., Richard Mourdock in Indiana). This in not a battle worth fighting, given the field that is being offered.

3) Proposition 28 – The Faux Term Limits Initiative – NO. Per B-Daddy – This will actually increase the time that legislators remain ensconced in uncompetitive districts. Vote NO..

4) Proposition 29 – Cigarette Tax Dollars for Special Interests – NO.  Increasing taxes on cigarettes to create another state government slush fund! A plan that is surely full of fail.

5) Mayor: Carl DeMaio. W.C. Varones summarizes the sentiments of all the SLOBs — DeMaio is the only reformer in the race. District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis is a GOP establishment coddler of corruption. Nathan Fletcher is a slimy opportunist who was behind the scenes supporting the Schwarzenegger tax hikes while pretending to be a fiscal conservative Bob Filner is a union-owned Washington Democrat. (MUT NOTE: Bonus — Fletcher became “Independent” so he enjoy the donations and support of progressives who realize Filner is an unsavory candidate unlikely to win this race).

6) San Diego County Propositions, as recommended by Dawn Wildman/SoCal Tax Revolt Coalition (with additional details from the San Diego Taxfighters).

  • Prop A: YES – Open city jobs to non-union contractors.
  • Prop B: YES – Reform pensions before they bankrupt us.
  • Prop C: NO – City of Chula Vista Charter Amendment. Limit Authority, Compensation and Establish Term Limits for Elected City Attorney. Establish Office of Legislative Counsel (more government offices are not what we need).
  • Prop D: YES – Municipalities going from General Law to Charter status gives cities greater control and flexibility in their decision making while holding officials accountable for those decisions.
  • Prop E: YES –  Implementing vacancy decontrol...and decontrol is something a good capitalist can get behind.
  • Prop F: YES – Under the current plurality election system, candidates can be elected to public office without receiving a majority of votes. Under a runoff majority system, the winner is guaranteed a majority of the support from the electorate.
  • Prop G: NO – Californians should be very wary of any measure with the following words: “bond”, “student”, “teacher”, “schools”.  It is just another way to hose the taxpayer.
  • Prop H: NO – For the same reasons as above.

7) Heaven Help me! I am suppose to select between Scott Peters for Congress/52nd District (a member of the council who was embroiled in the pension deficit scandal) or “true believer” Lori Saldana (who ordered the toxic “global warming solutions act”). I am going to have to go with the choice based an a Clintonian perspective: I think with enough pressure, Peters will be responsive to a little fiscal sanity. As you can tell with what is going on in the nation’s capital, “true believers” will double down whenever they are wrong.

8) State Senator: 39th district: George Plescia, a small business consultant.

9) Board of Supervisors, 3rd District: Dave Roberts. See W.C. Varones post for the reason, which I think is sensible.

10) City of San Diego Council District 7: Scott Sherman –– he is a small business owner who is closely aligned with Carl DeMaio. Plus, he has been calling the house alot — working hard for the vote. I have to respect the effort.

11) Judges: I will recommend that everyone head over to CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL VOTERS GUIDE and make your pick.

Read Full Post »